Advanced project management with Asana
Go deeper into Asana project and workflow configuration to coordinate dependencies, standardise information and prepare progress reviews that help project owners act.
Find your starting point
A good fit when everyday Asana use is established and you need to configure projects and review work against shared criteria.
Another option to consider
Team onboarding to AsanaIf the team still needs to align tasks, updates and comments, onboarding focuses on that everyday use.- Hours and sessions
- 8 hours live · 4 sessions of 2 h.
- Group size
- Up to 12 participants per trainer as a reference, adjusted to the practice and feedback.
What you will learn
- 01
Design a reusable project structure with shared fields and criteria.
- 02
Configure a tracking workflow, test a task's journey and review its dependencies.
- 03
Interpret progress and blockers, identify insufficient information and agree ownership and update routines.
A proposed programme
Configure a reusable project for recurring reports. Define shared fields and criteria, test a simple rule and review a delivery when data is missing. The aim is to make the structure show what needs attention, even when a high percentage of completed tasks appears reassuring.
We adapt the selection and depth of the modules to the group's starting point and goals.
01Structure repeatable projects
Fields, templates and agreements that keep information comparable across projects.
You will work on
- Choose fields that make deliveries comparable and define each value, without duplicating the assignee and due date in other fields.
- Prepare sections and reference tasks with deliverables, instructions and review criteria.
- Create a template using the available features and generate a second project to check which dates, people and data must change.
- Practice
- Build a recurring report structure with «Area» and «Review status» fields and check a second delivery created from the template.
- How you will check it
- Two comparable projects with their own references and no names, dates or data mistakenly carried over from the first report.
02Coordinate the workflow
Dependencies and rules available in your plan, with a review of exceptions.
You will work on
- Link data collection, validation and writing tasks using the dependencies available in the environment.
- Configure a rule with a specific trigger and action; test a normal path and another with incomplete information.
- Simulate a delayed source, review the affected dates and document who resolves the exception.
- Practice
- Test a review-assignment rule, then block validation because a source is missing; check the effect on the writing task and its date.
- How you will check it
- A tested workflow that distinguishes the rule’s action from human content review and gives an exception a clear owner.
03Progress reviews for owners
Available views and reporting options to answer specific questions about the project.
You will work on
- Choose a view and, if available, a chart that answer which deliveries are blocked and why.
- Check what tracking shows against tasks, fields and dependencies before summarising the status.
- Agree who updates the data, how often and when a decision must be requested.
- Practice
- Prepare a report review that shows blocked validation, its impact and the decision needed, even if other tasks are complete.
- How you will check it
- Progress tracking that explains the critical blocker and its next step; the completion percentage is not treated as proof that the report is ready.
Many tasks complete, one delivery blocked
Teaching example
Suggested practice: configure a reusable delivery project, follow a task from start to finish and simulate a date change or blocker. We review what progress tracking shows and document how to adjust the structure; the case and features are agreed beforehand.
Fictional classroom case. A team prepares recurring client reports. In the practice delivery, Irene validates the data and Diego writes the summary. The report needs data from two departments, but one source is still incomplete.
- Starting point
- Each report uses different fields and status names. The team counts completed tasks to assess progress, even though data validation must happen before the summary can be written.
- First attempt
- The first configuration standardises fields and assigns Irene when a task moves into review. With the incomplete source, the rule assigns correctly, but tracking still presents the delivery as almost ready and leaves the writing date unchanged.
- What we review
- The trainer asks the group to separate review assignment from data validation. They record the blocker, check Diego’s dependency and date and prepare a view focused on tasks that determine whether delivery is possible. The rule does not itself check whether a source is sufficient.
- Result
- Irene keeps validation open, Diego’s task shows what it is waiting for and its date needs confirmation. Tracking explains which data is missing, who must provide it and which decision the project owner needs to make.
Tracking must show what prevents delivery
Input
One source missing
Two departments · one incomplete source
Validation
Irene reviews
Assignment tested · validation open
Delivery
Diego waits
Dependency visible · date to confirm
Teaching illustration of a fictional case; this is not an Asana screenshot.
Before calling it complete
- The template maintains the same fields and criteria across reports without copying delivery-specific data.
- The rule has a recorded test and incomplete information is handled as an exception requiring review.
- The tracking view reveals the critical blocker, its owner and the date that needs revisiting.
Four sessions to put it into practice.
Reference edition · 8 h live
Reference edition: 8 live hours across 4 sessions of 2 hours. Practice takes place in a prepared project; fields, rules, dependencies and dashboards are selected for the confirmed plan and permissions. Feature availability in every account is not assumed.
- Session 12 h
Design a reusable structure
Define report fields, values, sections and criteria; test a second delivery created from the template.
By the endA repeatable structure with delivery-specific data.
- Session 22 h
Configure and test the workflow
Create dependencies and a simple rule with the available features; follow a task and check the action.
By the endA workflow with a documented trigger, action and test.
- Session 32 h
Resolve the exception
Introduce an incomplete source, review the blocker and affected dates and assign its resolution.
By the endA visible exception with an owner and reviewed dates.
- Session 42 h
Prepare the progress review
Check views or charts against tasks, record the pending decision and improve the structure using feedback.
By the endA reusable project and progress tracking that supports action.
If your team needs to go further
- Portfolio architecture, organisation-wide capacity planning and workflows spanning many departments require an additional scope.
- Migrating real projects, connecting applications or rolling out the template in production is agreed separately.
Learn with someone who designs work systems.

Guillermo Mascaraque Piña
Work systems consultant
Over two years of experience designing systems for companies across industries and sizes.
Guillermo is the planned trainer for this programme. Dates, language and his availability are confirmed when the edition is agreed.
With guidance, practice and support.
Each delivery includes working materials, feedback on practical work and assessment against the agreed objectives.
Materials you can keep
Downloadable, versioned guides, exercises and review criteria for internal use.
To prepare and complete the delivery
A short recommendation, an editable communications kit and a group learning report.
TOF’s own certificate
A certificate of achievement after the agreed assessment. It is not a vendor certification.
A month of email support
On the content covered, up to two accumulated hours for the whole group.
Your team carries out the practice. Implementation services are agreed separately. See the scope →

Asana Solutions Partner
As an Asana Solutions Partner, we bring applied experience in coordinating projects, ownership and work tracking.
Our partner profile ↗The partnership belongs to The Optimal Flow. Learn’s certificate is issued by TOF; it is not a vendor certification.